Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma — When Kidney-Sparing Endoscopic Management Does Not Achieve Complete Tumour Resection

This protocol addresses low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in patients who have undergone kidney-sparing endoscopic management, but in whom complete tumour resection was not achieved or residual/recurrent disease was identified on second-look ureteroscopy within eight weeks of initial treatment.

Clinical Scenario

All of the following features must be present to characterise the low-risk sub-population in which kidney-sparing management is initially indicated:

Previous Line — Basis for Escalation

The preceding treatment — kidney-sparing management via endoscopic ablation using flexible ureteroscopy with holmium and/or thulium laser, or percutaneous management for renal pelvis tumours, or distal ureterectomy for distal ureteral disease, followed by second-look ureteroscopy within eight weeks — aimed to achieve complete tumour resection with no residual or recurrent disease.

This protocol is indicated when those goals were not met.

Next Treatment Step

When kidney-sparing endoscopic management fails to achieve the required oncological endpoints, the approach moves to a definitive surgical procedure targeting the kidney and ureter. The complete protocol specifies the operative scope and associated technical details.

Instant Access to Structured Evidence-Based Regimens

References

DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.02.023

Unifocal disease, Tumour size <2 cm, Negative for high-grade cytology, Low-grade URS biopsy, No invasive aspect on CT. All of these factors need to be present.

For low-risk cancers, kidney-sparing surgery is the preferred approach, as survival is similar to that after RNU.

View source ↗