Clinically relevant axial involvement defines a distinct and often undertreated subset of psoriatic arthritis. When a first-line biologic DMARD or JAK inhibitor has been tried and the expected treatment targets were not reached, a structured switch to the next line of therapy is warranted.
Clinical scenario: Psoriatic arthritis with clinically relevant axial disease — patient has not achieved the required response on an initial bDMARD or JAK inhibitor and is being considered for the next treatment step.
Previous first-line therapy: An IL-17A inhibitor, a TNF inhibitor, an IL-17A/F inhibitor, or a JAK inhibitor — selected as the initial agent for predominantly axial disease.
Targets not reached on that therapy: Improvement at 3 months; remission or low disease activity at 6 months.
Failure to meet these targets is the criterion for escalation to this protocol.
The next treatment line aims for measurable improvement at 3 months, with a goal of remission or low disease activity at 6 months. Disease activity should be assessed at regular intervals and therapy adjusted if these targets are not met.
DOI: 10.1136/ard-2024-225531
In patients with clinically relevant axial disease with an insufficient response to NSAIDs, therapy with an IL-17A inhibitor, a TNF inhibitor, an IL-17 A/F inhibitor or a JAKi should be considered.
For axial disease, in agreement also with the recently updated ASAS/EULAR axSpA recommendations, we continue to judge csDMARDs as not relevant.
In patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to a bDMARD or a JAKi, switching to another bDMARD or JAKi should be considered, including one switch within a class.
Treatment should be aimed at reaching the target of remission or, alternatively, low disease activity, by regular disease activity assessment and appropriate adjustment of therapy.
View source ↗