Priapism Refractory to Corporal Tunneling: What to Do When Shunting Has Not Resolved Detumescence
Clinical Scenario
This protocol applies when priapism has persisted despite corporal tunneling through a distal corporoglanular shunt, and the primary therapeutic goal — penile detumescence — has not been achieved. A further escalation step is indicated.
Previous Treatment & Failure Condition
Goal not reached — escalation required
Prior intervention: Corporal tunneling through distal corporoglanular shunt
Target not achieved:
Penile detumescence
Next-Line Approach & Clinical Goals
When tunneling procedures have not restored detumescence, a surgical implantation approach targeting the erectile bodies directly may be considered. This strategy is associated with goals of achieving penile detumescence and resolution of penile pain.
The complete structured regimen — including patient eligibility criteria, procedural considerations, and clinical decision thresholds — is available via the link below.
References
- Clinicians may consider placement of a penile prosthesis in a patient with untreated acute ischemic priapism greater than 36 hours or in those who are refractory to shunting, with or without tunneling.
- The available data suggest that prostheses placed in the setting of acute ischemic priapism are highly effective in providing detumescence, relief of pain, preservation of penile length, return to sexual activity, and overall satisfaction.
DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002236
View source ↗