Fibrosing Mediastinitis With Progressive Symptoms or Mediastinal Compression After First-Line Medical Therapy Did Not Achieve Goals
This protocol addresses patients with active symptoms of fibrosing mediastinitis, or significant progressive compression of vital mediastinal structures. In this population, management is typically divided between medical and interventional approaches.
Initial medical therapy — which may include corticosteroids as the primary option, or alternatives such as corticosteroids combined with mycophenolate, high-dose corticosteroids combined with methotrexate, tamoxifen, or antifungal therapy with itraconazole — did not achieve the expected goals of symptom improvement and reduction in fibrosis findings on chest CT. This protocol defines the next step after that failure.
Reduction in symptom burden, reduction in PET avidity, reduction in lesion volume, and no evidence of disease progression.
References
DOI: 10.1007/s13665-025-00382-3
- In patients with symptoms or significant progressive compression of vital structures, therapies are typically divided into medical versus interventional.
- Finally, in refractory disease, rituximab is the typical therapy of choice given the proposed mechanism of fibrosis involving accumulation of CD20 positive B cells triggering the fibrotic cascade.
- In a case series published in 2014 by Westerly et al. [25], they examined the therapeutic response to the usage of rituximab with differing levels of mediastinal involvement with reduction in symptom burden and PET avidity noted in all three cases.
- None of the 22 patients showed evidence of disease progression after receiving rituximab.
- Almost half of the patients had reduction in lesion volume and 73% experienced improvement in symptoms.