Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ
ICD-10 D06ICD-11 2E66

Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ in Reproductive-Age Patients Who Desire Future Pregnancy After Negative-Margin Conization

This protocol addresses the specific clinical scenario of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) in a patient of reproductive age who desires future pregnancy, has achieved negative margin status on cervical conization, and is willing and able to adhere to a surveillance programme.

Clinical Scenario

The patient is of reproductive age, has a confirmed diagnosis of cervical AIS, and has undergone conization with negative margins achieved. She has expressed a clear desire for future pregnancy and is committed to the follow-up required for fertility-sparing management. For this population, fertility-sparing management with a conization procedure is an acceptable approach when negative margins have been confirmed and surveillance adherence can be ensured.

Treatment Approach (Partial Overview)

The complete protocol specifies surgical management options tailored to this scenario, including a procedure specifically considered for patients in whom ongoing fertility preservation is a priority — alongside the standard surgical recommendation for cases where conservative management is no longer sufficient. The full decision algorithm, candidate criteria, and procedural details are in the structured protocol.

Full regimen, candidacy criteria, and clinical details available via the link below.

Instant Access to Structured Evidence-Based Regimens

References

DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003761

For patients of reproductive age who desire future pregnancy, for whom negative margin status on conization has been achieved, and who are willing and able to adhere to surveillance recommendations, fertility-sparing management with a conization procedure is acceptable (AII).

For patients in whom negative margins cannot be achieved after multiple excisional procedures, hysterectomy is recommended, and fertility-sparing management should be pursued only in select cases and after a frank discussion about the significantly increased risk of persistent or recurrent AIS and cancer.

Data are lacking on outcomes after radical trachelectomy for treatment of persistent AIS, but it could be considered as an alternative for patients who strongly desire future fertility.

View source ↗