Treatment of Aneurysmal Bone Cyst When Surgical Resection Is Not Feasible or Would Substantially Increase Morbidity
Clinical Scenario
This protocol applies to aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) that are deemed irresectable, or that are located in anatomic areas — such as the spine or pelvis — where surgery would substantially increase morbidity. In these settings, the size or location of the lesion makes conventional resection inappropriate or prohibitively risky.
Why Surgery Is Not the Primary Option Here
Radiation therapy is currently reserved for tumours deemed irresectable because of the risk of sarcoma induction. Where surgical intervention would substantially increase morbidity — due to the anatomic location or extent of the lesion — non-surgical strategies become the primary consideration for achieving local control.
Treatment Approach (Partial Summary)
In this scenario, management focuses on achieving local control of the lesion through approaches that address its vascularity or apply targeted radiation. The full protocol details the recommended interventions and their specific indications for this clinical situation.
References
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53587
- Radiation therapy is currently reserved for tumors deemed irresectable because of the risk of sarcoma induction.
- In anatomic locations where surgery would substantially increase morbidity, embolization or radiotherapy are the most often used therapies.
- If the size or location (the spine or pelvis) of the lesion makes treatment challenging, this method of treatment is effective.
- It has also been shown to be an effective therapeutic strategy to cut off the nutrient supply and change the hemodynamics of the lesion without affecting the vascularity of adjacent tissues or structures.
- In radiation therapy, external beam radiation is used causing damage to the nuclear DNA to induce cell death.
- Donati et al. noted a high rate of local control in ABCs of the sacrum that was treated solely with embolization.
View source ↗