Acute upper limb arterial occlusion
ICD-10 I74.2 · ICD-11 BD30.0

Acute Upper Limb Arterial Occlusion: What to Do When Surgical Brachial Embolectomy Has Not Restored Limb Perfusion

Clinical Scenario

This protocol addresses acute upper limb ischaemia where the limb is threatened — presenting with motor or sensory loss — or where preserving limb function is critical to the patient's quality of life.

Conservative anticoagulation alone is not recommended when the limb is threatened or when limb function is important to quality of life.

Previous Treatment & Why It Was Not Sufficient

The first-line step — surgical brachial embolectomy under local anaesthesia, with intra-operative completion angiography and systemic anticoagulation — aims to restore visible perfusion and a palpable wrist pulse.

Failure condition: Visible perfusion and a palpable wrist pulse were not achieved following surgical embolectomy. This protocol sets out the next step.

Next-Line Approach (Overview Only)

After embolectomy has not fully restored perfusion, the approach moves to endovascular interventions — catheter-based and aspiration techniques — alongside targeted therapies for distal or residual ischaemia. The complete algorithm, indications, and clinical decision points are available in the full structured protocol.

Instant Access to Structured Evidence-Based Regimens

References

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.09.006

For a patient with acute ischaemia of the upper limb, conservative treatment with anticoagulation alone is not recommended if the arm is threatened, or if limb function is important to quality of life.

Endovascular treatments such as percutaneous thrombectomy, aspiration thrombectomy, or CDT have been used for acute upper limb ischaemia, but only case reports exist to describe their benefits and complications.

Primary distal thrombosis of the hand (or residual distal ischaemia after embolectomy) may benefit from CDT or intravenous prostaglandin therapy.

View source ↗